Doctor Sleep Movie Poster

Doctor Sleep

User Rating: 71%
Language: English
Runtime: 152 min

About Movie

A traumatized, alcoholic Dan Torrance meets Abra, a kid who also has the ability to "shine." He tries to protect her from the True Knot, a cult whose goal is to feed off of people like them in order to remain immortal.

Movie Related Video

Basic Details

Release Date:

30 October 2019

Genres:

Horror

Production Country:

United States of America

Original Language:

English

Runtime:

152 min

Production Company:

Warner Bros. Pictures, Vertigo Entertainment, Intrepid Pictures

Budget:

-

Revenue:

-

Tagline:

Dare to go back

Movie Crew

Producer:

Trevor Macy

Producer:

Jon Berg

Screenplay:

Mike Flanagan

Director:

Mike Flanagan

Movie Cast

Ewan McGregor
Ewan McGregor
Danny Torrance
Rebecca Ferguson
Rebecca Ferguson
Rose the Hat
Kyliegh Curran
Kyliegh Curran
Abra Stone
Cliff Curtis
Cliff Curtis
Billy Freeman
Zahn McClarnon
Zahn McClarnon
Crow Daddy
Emily Alyn Lind
Emily Alyn Lind
Snakebite Andi
Selena Anduze
Selena Anduze
Apron Annie
Robert Longstreet
Robert Longstreet
Barry
Carel Struycken
Carel Struycken
Grampa Flick
Katie Parker
Katie Parker
Silent Sarey
No image to show
James Flanagan
Diesel Doug
No image to show
Met Clark
Short Eddie
Zackary Momoh
Zackary Momoh
David Stone
Jocelin Donahue
Jocelin Donahue
Lucy
No image to show
Dakota Hickman
Young Abra
Carl Lumbly
Carl Lumbly
Dick Halloran
Henry Thomas
Henry Thomas
The Bartender
Bruce Greenwood
Bruce Greenwood
Dr. John
Sallye Hooks
Sallye Hooks
Mrs. Massey
Alex Essoe
Alex Essoe
Wendy Torrance
No image to show
Roger Dale Floyd
Young Danny
No image to show
George Mengert
Charlie
Jacob Tremblay
Jacob Tremblay
Bradley Trevor
Chelsea Talmadge
Chelsea Talmadge
Deenie
Violet McGraw
Violet McGraw
Violet
Bethany Anne Lind
Bethany Anne Lind
Violet's Mother
Nicholas Pryor
Nicholas Pryor
Eddie
Deadra Moore
Deadra Moore
Mrs. Robertson
Jason Davis
Jason Davis
Businessman
No image to show
Alyssa Gonzalez
Supermarket Clerk
Shane Brady
Shane Brady
Magician
Danny Lloyd
Danny Lloyd
Baseball Spectator
Michael Monks
Michael Monks
Delbert Grady
Hugh Maguire
Hugh Maguire
Horace Derwent
No image to show
Sadie Heim
Grady Twin
No image to show
Kk Heim
Grady Twin
No image to show
Mistie Gibby
Bobbie
No image to show
Callie Brook McClincy
Library Kid
No image to show
Logan Medina
Library Kid
Johnnie Gordon
Johnnie Gordon
Library Kid #3
Molly C. Quinn
Molly C. Quinn
Mrs. Grady
Evan Dumouchel
Evan Dumouchel
Victor T. Boorman
MacLeod Andrews
MacLeod Andrews
Roger Macassi
No image to show
Fedor Steer
Vito the Chopper
Charles Green
Charles Green
U.S. Senator
Marc Farley
Marc Farley
James Parris
No image to show
Juan Carlos Romero Perez
Baseball Coach
No image to show
Sarah Morrison
Girl
Juan Gaspard
Juan Gaspard
Bar Patron (uncredited)
Esteban Cueto
Esteban Cueto
Large Man (uncredited)
No image to show
David Michael-Smith
Recovering Alcoholic (uncredited)
No image to show
Marc Demeter
Construction Worker (uncredited)
No image to show
Josh Turner
Dirty Biker (uncredited)
No image to show
Jay D. Kacho
Detective (uncredited)
No image to show
J.T. Blair
Middle School Student (uncredited)
No image to show
Kevin Petruski Jr.
Bar Patron (uncredited)
No image to show
Thomas Downing
Bar Patron (uncredited)
No image to show
Scott Lane
Dirty Biker (uncredited)
No image to show
Jeremy Connell
Pedestrian (uncredited)
No image to show
Shawndella Roberts
Townsperson (uncredited)
No image to show
Kaitlyn McCormick
Twins (uncredited)
Henry Thomas
Henry Thomas
Jack Torrance

Movie Review

msbreviews

If you enjoy reading my Spoiler-Free reviews, please follow my blog :)

There's this misconceived idea that "scary movies" are the ones with demons, monsters, or ghosts literally showing up in jump scare sequences, one after another, accompanied by an extremely loud sound. Granted, we're scared of what we're scared of. No debate here. However, one common complaint about this type of horror films is that they aren't "scary enough". I couldn't disagree more. These movies are the ones that truly get to us and stay with us for a while. If we watch a film with cyclical jump scares, we're going to forget about it as soon as we leave the theater. Movies with a horrific story, based on relatable themes, those are the ones that leave us uncomfortable and disturbed. I'm just writing this "prologue" to say that you shouldn't go in expecting a "scary" film. At least, not in a mainstream way. Moving on...

As you probably know by now (if you don't, check out my The Shining's review), I'm a huge fan of Stanley Kubrick's adaptation of Stephen King's novel of the same name. It's a cult classic horror movie, one that influenced generations to come, especially regarding filmmaking techniques and equipment. With that said, Mike Flanagan had one of the toughest jobs of 2019. Not only did he need to deliver a sequel worthy of being associated with a beloved classic, but he had to deal with all the differences between the source material and Kubrick's changes. I'm going to leave a SPOILER WARNING for The Shining since the film came out 40 years ago, and I already wrote a review about it. Still, SPOILER-FREE for Doctor Sleep, don't worry.

In case you don't know, the major difference between King's book and Kubrick's cinematic adaptation is the ending. In the book, Jack Torrance forgets to relieve the hotel boiler's pressure, and it explodes, destroying the hotel and killing Jack in the process. In Kubrick's movie, Jack freezes to death in the maze outside the hotel while chasing his son, while the hotel stands tall. Flanagan is able to do the impossible: he perfectly continues the story left by Kubrick while respecting King's "demands". Just don't go with a "purist" mentality, thinking that Flanagan doesn't have the right to explore and expand "the shining". It's a sequel, so expect things to be added to the story (nothing is removed or retconned, so relax). As long as it makes sense, be always open to new ideas.

As the director, Flanagan proves once again he's a pretty talented guy by seamlessly recreating some of The Shining's most iconic scenes, but also by delivering some tricks of his own. With the help of his amazing cinematographer, Michael Fimognari, they are able to generate incredible levels of tension, characteristic of the original film. As the editor, he puts together everything remarkably well. The sequences inside someone's mind are wonderfully handled and provide some of the best moments of the entire movie. However, there's a massive difference when it comes to how the runtime flows in each film.

Both cross the 140-minute mark, and both purposefully employ slow pacing. Nevertheless, The Shining feels like it goes by way faster than Doctor Sleep (and mathematically it does have less 5-10 minutes, but that's not the point). Why? Due to Kubrick's movie constantly having long takes and extense dialogues, while Flanagan's installment has a modern approach with regular cuts plus much more action. Audiences presumably won't think of this (it's not like the "average Joe" notices or even cares if a scene has been going for 5 minutes straight or pieced together with 50 cuts), and just assume that the latter is more boring than the first without really understanding why.

People will probably blindly blame the story, but Doctor Sleep has a lot more "blockbuster entertainment" than The Shining. The latter is pretty much two hours spent inside a hotel where dialogue is the primary source of entertainment (things only go crazy in the last 15-20 minutes), and we all know that the general public usually doesn't fall for that. The sequel has a lot more action, subplots, and characters, so the runtime should go by faster than the original, right? No. This film is the number one proof that I'm going to use from now on to defend that uncut dialogue sequences and overall long takes are the best way of managing an extended runtime without it feeling too "heavy", especially in a psychological horror flick.

I wrote all these last paragraphs not to complain about the movie's being too slow, too long, or too dull. I'm just trying to help everyone understand why the film might feel slower and (much) longer, while protecting its story because the screenplay is indeed extremely well-written. Like in the original, exposition is handled beautifully with scarce lazy displays, but it's the characters of Ewan McGregor and the debutant Kyliegh Curran that carry the narrative effortlessly. McGregor is the perfect casting as Danny Torrance, and he does a great job of embodying Dan's personality. However, it's Danny's journey through his young and adult years that impresses me.

Exceptional character development! Danny's life after the events at the Overlook Hotel is as realistic and logical as it could be. Flanagan does a phenomenal job in handling this character and throwing just the right obstacles in his path. The way he deals with the aftermath of The Shining, how he grows up as a man, and even what he ends up doing for a living, everything is absolutely perfect. Furthermore, he's not alone. Abra is a badass young girl who wants to use her "shine" to protect others, but this time it's the actress that steals the spotlight from the character. Kyliegh Curran delivers one of the best young acting debuts I've ever witnessed. She's wonderful as Abra, and her range of emotions is already surprisingly vast.

She has some of the best scenes of the movie, especially when she's "fighting" Rose the Hat, but here is where we get to my major issue with the film. Rebecca Ferguson gives an outstanding performance, no doubt about it. She elevates infinite sequences, giving 200% to her role. However, her character and The True Knot group are the only significant flaw of this sequel. When writing a villain, there are basically two paths for success: either make the "bad guy" a compelling character with whom the audience can create some sort of empathy with and understand where he/she comes from, or turn him/her into a menacing, powerful, scary force that makes us fear for our heroes.

Flanagan apparently chooses the latter route, and unfortunately, it's his only misstep. I don't know if King didn't allow for changes to Rose or The True Knot cult, but they don't quite work when adapting to the big screen. Not only their history is never truly explored, but their motivations are too shallow, so I didn't care for a single character from the group, not even Rose. If she was the "menacing, powerful, scary force" that I wrote above, this wouldn't be so important, but the truth is she isn't. As the narrative progresses, there's a constant reminder that our heroes are in danger and that Rose is astonishingly strong, but the interactions between her and Abra prove the contrary. So, I never really felt frightened or overwhelmed by her.

A decent portion of runtime is handed to Rose's group, but its development didn't work for me at all. They're not bad villains, and they're still more fleshed out that a lot of characters in horror movies. I just think something's missing. Nevertheless, that's the only major problem I have with the movie. For true fans of The Shining, the countless references and Easter Eggs are such a delight (there's good and bad fan-service, the one present in this sequel only appears after we are already invested in the story and its characters, demonstrating once more Flanagan's talent). From the haunting and addictive score that The Newton Brothers are able to seamlessly adapt to the sequel to the influential Kubrick's framing, Flanagan and his team produce something pretty extraordinary having in mind this is a sequel to one of the most beloved horror films of all-time.

In the end, Doctor Sleep might be the first sequel/remake/reboot/whatever to a cult classic movie that doesn't diminish the original, disgracefully copies it or takes something away from it, while actually being an individually great film with a captivating narrative and compelling leads, plus the right amount of homages to the classic. Mike Flanagan took the impossible task of balancing both Stephen King's The Shining and Stanley Kubrick's cinematic adaptation, and successfully nailed pretty much everything regarding the connection between the main stories. In addition to the slow pacing not working as well as in the original, The True Knot group is the big stumble in an otherwise pretty consistent screenplay. However, the phenomenal cast (with a terrific debut performance from Kyliegh Curran) elevate every scene, ultimately driving the sequel to a nostalgia-full ending that will turn out to be divisive among fans. I stand on the good side. Therefore, I genuinely appreciate this movie. If you're a fan of the original, you can't miss this one!

Rating: A-

SWITCH.

‘Doctor Sleep’ could go either way with ‘The Shining’ fans - some will see it as a perfect follow-up, others will deem it too different (which I think is a good thing). ‘Doctor Sleep’ works as both and also stands on its own; you could fill in the blanks pretty easily if you had never read or seen the original film. It’s a fun supernatural horror film aided by fantastic performances by Ferguson and Curran.
- Chris dos Santos

Read Chris' full article...
https://www.maketheswitch.com.au/article/review-doctor-sleep-heres-the-shining-stephen-king-has-been-waiting-for

Other Movies

This product uses the TMDb API but is not endorsed or certified by TMDb.